Skip to main content

October 24, 1904

 

Jean Duvet (1485 to sometime after 1562 ) was a 16th century French goldsmith and engraver. He left us a series of prints of the Apocalypse, a popular subject in his era. These attracted the attention of the art historian, Lady Emilia Francis Strong Dilke. (September 2, 1840 to October 24, 1904). First some background on the historian:

Lady Dilke was raised in a home of affluence and enthusiasm for cultural endeavors. William Holman Hunt proposed to her. John Ruskin guided her career. According to the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography account of her life, 


After completing her art education, Strong[her maiden name] returned to Oxford, where she became engaged to the 48-year-old scholar Mark Pattison (1813-1884), rector of Lincoln College, in June 1861, and married him at Iffley church on 10 September 1861. Despite her intellectual marginalization as a woman in Oxford, Francis Pattison entered upon a life of serious scholarship, focusing upon the study of French cultural history and art. At the same time she cut a striking figure socially, developing an artistic and intellectual circle more in keeping with the salons of seventeenth-century France-upon which she was establishing herself as an authority-than with the stuffy masculine culture of Oxford college life....
She began to carve out her own scholarly and critical principles, differentiating her approach to art equally from the moral aesthetic of her former mentor, Ruskin, and the ahistorical impressionism of Walter Pater....

After the death of her first husband, our art historian married an old friend, who was emerging from a divorce scandal, Sir Charles Wentworth Dilke, second baronet (1843-1911). They were happy, and Lady Dilke published in a variety of forms, and also participated in the trade union movement. She wrote of the effect of social convention on a woman's ambitions but showed by example how perseverance could be rewarded.

Lady Dilke was the author of  The Renaissance of Art in France (1879). 
Herein she describes an engraving dating 1555, a self portrait of the artist -- Jean Duvet-- working amidst apocalyptic events. There is a mouse under his chair and a dog and cat beside it, the last animals brushing each other. The cat seems most interested in an approaching swan. The dog is alert but calm. The mouse is nervous.

Here are the words of Lady Dilke about this print:

Amongst those illustrations of the Apocalypse which are indisputably of Duvet's own invention, first in order, is the frontispiece. He has here represented himself an old man, still strong and vigorous. The figure, which is partially draped, has much dignity. On the table, before which he sits, lie two tablets which contain the inscription before quoted. An hour-glass stands near the tablets, and a graver lies ready to hand.

Behind rises a thick wood, and to right and left appear an angel and a demon, and on the old engraver's head the angel lays his hand. A broad river flows down from top to bottom of the picture, and narrows suddenly after reaching the jutting eminence of the bank on -which Duvet has set his table, flowing under a little step, and then out past a stone in the near foreground amongst lovely groups of flowering rushes, amidst which two slender birds are fighting.

High up above, on the stone, sit a cat and a dog; the cat, stealthily crouching, ready to spring; she has forgotten the presence of the dog, and even the attraction of the mouse who has sought shelter beneath the engraver's chair, in the fury to which she is excited by the approach of a swan, who, having broken the chain which fastened him to a post in the river, floats across towards the bank where Duvet awaits him, bearing in his bill a dart.

It sounds to me like my tastes and Lady Dilke's are  similar. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

August 23, 1941

Onora Sylvia O'Neill (August 23, 1941) is a British thinker. She studied at Oxford and received a doctorate from Harvard. After a noted career, in 1992, she  accepted the post of  Principal of  N ewnham College, Cambridge, and since 2006 she has been Emeritus Professor of Philosophy at Cambridge. Her 1997 paper, "Environmental Values, Anthroporphism, and Speciesism" contains a timely  argument  in which Dr. O'Neill, (she prefers that title to the "Baroness" to which her elevation to the peerage allows) points out inadequacies in the use of the term speciesism to argue against according humans more ethical rights than aspects of the non human world.  A viewpoint that puts " a person torturing a cat is on a par with a cat torturing a bird," is not one she finds supportable. The link is to a downloadable version of this paper.  We have  this picture  of Onora O'Neill, in 2002, at Newnham College: We meet in the Principal's lodge at Ne

August 22, 1806

Jean Honoré Fragonard (April 4 1732 to August 22, 1 806) the famous French painter, whose art illustrated the lives of a gilded class, included cats occasionally in his scenes. We have some biographical context from the  National Gallery of Art : 'Fragonard was one of the most prolific of the eighteenth-century painters and draftsmen. Born ... in Grasse in southern France, he moved with his family at an early age to Paris. He first took a position as a clerk, but having demonstrated an interest in art, he worked in the studio of the still life and genre painter Jean Siméon Chardin (French, 1699 - 1779). After spending a short time with Chardin, from whom he probably learned merely the bare rudiments of his craft, he entered the studio of François Boucher ....1703 - 1770). Under Boucher’s tutelage Fragonard’s talent developed rapidly, and he was soon painting decorative pictures and pastoral subjects very close to his master’s style....Although Fragonard apparently never took cour

November 21, 1852

  A comparative view of the social life of England and France from the Restoration of Charles the Second to the French Revolution  (1828) was a history written by Mary Berry, (March 16 1763 to November 21 1852). Berry was a friend of Thomas Macaulay, and other intellectual luminaries, of the late 18th century. This volume enhanced her fame, but she was already known for her editing of Horace Walpole's correspondence, and other books also. I am gong to briefly quote from the preface because it gives a good sense of an ahistorical past which governed the imaginations of writers until about this period. You can see her need to defend her history because if things really changed, that might cast doubt on the fundamentals of the 18th century world. (If things did NOT change the reason to write history is different or non-existent). Nowadays we are accustomed to the view that fundamental worldviews can shift in an historical time, but our view was itself an historical development. So thi